enuja: Marker sketch of an abstracted human form (me), in yellow, stretching, with a solid red background. (Default)
As I've mentioned before, Little Free Libraries have been getting me back into reading. And I also bought several books on Independent Bookstore Day.

I've been more into non-fiction lately, but fiction tends to grab my attention and provide suspense, and I've been reading much more when I'm reading fiction than I'm reading nonfiction. I'm reading a slim little volume by Rebecca Solnit, "Hope in the Dark," which has been stuck in my dark backpack for about a month and a half now, half read.

But just this week I picked up Assassin's Blade, by Sarah J. Mass. It's a collection of novellas that functions as a prequel to The Throne of Glass. I didn't love it. It's pretty similar to the fantasy fiction I used to read huge volumes of when I was a teenager, but I'm not a teenager anymore. I just don't think that I'm the audience for this.

It's also a little different than most of what I used to read: Assassin's Blade is definitely Romantasy, and I'm much less into Romance than most other genres. If it were more straight fantasy I might like it more, but the thick heaping of "enemies to lovers" and other romance tropes were my least favorite part of Assassin's Blade.

I did read it very quickly, though. And I also had a book I'd already read, ready to put back in the Little Free Library. And the little Free Library is pretty empty right now. So I knew I should go put Assassin's Blade, along with Tooth and Claw, which I have already reviewed, and some puzzles, in the Little Free Library. But I hadn't written a review of Assassin's Blade, and I didn't want to let go of the books.

I grew up primarily reading library books, not buying books, and there weren't Little Free Libraries when I was young, so I've never owned very many books. I generally think of myself as anti-materialistic, but I'm struggling to give up books!

I did write a little about Assassin's Blade, most of which is above, and then I went ahead and put the two novels, and two puzzles, in the little Free Library. So I am working through my book related materialism. But it's so strange to not want to put back in the Little Free Library two books that I got from the Little Free Library! It did feel good to let go of them, though, and hopefully I'll continue to be both anti-materialistic and generous.
enuja: Marker sketch of an abstracted human form (me), in yellow, stretching, with a solid red background. (Default)
Tooth and Claw. Jo Walton. 2003

I picked this book up at a Little Free Library, because it looked like a quick and well-contained read which would be fun and easy, to help my goal of reading more. This wasn't as easy a read as I expected, although it is a delight.

Tooth and Claw is a Victorian novel, specifically modeled after Framely Parsonage, by Anthony Trollope, from 1859. However, it's a Victorian novel in which the characters are all dragons, because, as Joe Walton says in the "Dedication, Thanks, and Notes" of the novel, "It has to be admitted that a number of the core axioms of the Victorian novel are just wrong. People aren't like that. Women, especially, aren't like that. This novel is the result of wondering what a world would be like if they were, if the axioms of the sentimental Victorian novel were inescapable laws of biology."

This novel was written by an author who loves Victorian novels, and written for readers who love Victorian novels. I have never even read a single Victorian novel, and therefore do not know the core axioms of Victorian novels. I do have the habit of reading novels twice in a row, the first time devouring it for suspense and speed, the second time taking it more slowly, looking at nuance, and writing my review. My second time through, the beginning of this novel makes a lot more sense. If you're experienced with Victorian novels, you might be able to really understand it the first time through, but the fact that the main characters are cannibalistic dragons might turn you off a bit. However, this is just making the cannibalistic scheming for inheritance in high society extremely literal.

Tooth and Claw really is wildly inventive, with the dragons wearing hats and sometimes riding trains, and, of course, having a hugely important hierarchical social structure, and extreme biological differences between male and female dragons. Female dragons have hands, and so can easily write, while male dragons have claws, which makes writing harder, but fighting easier.

This is a biting satire of Victorian society and novels, making Victorians actual monsters instead of metaphorical monsters. But it's also a sentimental Victorian novel where circumstances conspire to marry people off ideally. It is (mostly) beautifully well crafted, and I'm very happy I read it. I am not the ideal reader, but I loved it for the creativity and world building, for the literilization of metaphor.

Jo Walton's review of her own book, and description of how she came to write it, is delightful, and, like the novel itself, well worth the read.
https://reactormag.com/dragons-of-the-prime-jo-walton-on-writing-tooth-and-claw//

Profile

enuja: Marker sketch of an abstracted human form (me), in yellow, stretching, with a solid red background. (Default)
enuja

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 13th, 2026 10:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios